Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47157 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Paswan, S/o Akhilesh Paswan, Resident of village- Gamahariya, Ward no. 14, P.S.- Bhargama, Distt- Araria (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Ravish, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025 Heard Mr. Kumar Ravish, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025 dated 19.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the so-called victim has been recovered and she has recorded her statement before the Judicial Magistrate under Section 183 of the BNSS, in which she has not supported the allegations levelled by her mother (informant) in the FIR. It is further submitted that the prosecution's story narrated in the FIR

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47157 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 2/2 completely differs from the story narrated by the victim in her statement, which falsifies the allegation.

4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the petitioner's prayer for bail and submits that there is a serious allegation against the petitioner in the FIR.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the above-stated facts and mainly the victim's statement recorded before the Judicial Magistrate, which goes against the prosecution's allegations levelled in the FIR, in my opinion, it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Shailendra Singh, J) annu/- U T