← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1640/2021bail granted

Ramuna Yadav @ Ramuna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-07Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1640 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2020 Thana- DAWATH District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

RAMUNA YADAV @ RAMUNA SINGH S/O Ram Chandra Singh, 2.

BIJENDRA YADAV @ BIJENDRA SINGH S/o Yamuna Singh, 3.

MANJEE YADAV @ MANJEE SINGH S/O Ramuna Singh, 4.

SAROJ SINGH S/o Godhan Singh, 5.

SANJAY SINGH S/O Sabha Singh, 6.

SABHA SINGH @ SAMA SINGH S/O Late Saryu Singh, All Resident of Village - Paramdih, P.S. - Dawath, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.

: Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 324, 325, 354, 323, 341, 447, 147, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application against petitioner no.3. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1640 of 2021(3) dt.07-12-2021 2/3 withdrawn against petitioner no.3.

Allegation against the petitioners alongwith other accused persons is said to have assaulted the informant and his family members.

It has been submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. The injuries are simple in nature except petitioner no.3 who has assaulted the victim by means of rod on the head and the injury is grievous in nature, who has withdrawn this application.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail application.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners except petitioner no.3, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/ successor Court, in connection with Dawath P.S. Case No. 36/2020, subject to the conditions as laid

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1640 of 2021(3) dt.07-12-2021 3/3 down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amitkumar/- U T