Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9813 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -96 Year- 2014 Thana -KASIMBAZAR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Vikash Kumar son of Ganga Mahto resident of Village - Naya Tola Chandanbag, P.S. - Kasim Bazar, District - Munger. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party : Mr. A.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2015 Petitioner is languishing in custody since 03.08.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
It is alleged that on 11.06.2014 the informant was informed that his neighbour Suraj Kumar and Deepak Kumar along with 3-4 persons entered into the house and resorted to firing which hit to Dinesh Kumar who subsequently succumbed to the injuries. The First Information Report was registered against Suraj Kumar and Deepak Kumar. The name of the petitioner subsequently sprang up during investigation when the petitioner confessed that he was hired for Rs. 7000/- for commission of the offence.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that confession is before the police and in pursuance
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9813 of 2015 (2) dt.20-03-2015 2/2 to confession there is no recovery when co-accused Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Ram whose name also sprang up during investigation has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 45141 of 2014.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Munger in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 96 of 2014.
Since the petitioner has criminal antecedent, let learned Court below cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if the petitioner gets substantially involved in similar nature of offence or defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/- U T