← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/822/2014allowed

Madhu Sudan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-05Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.822 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Madhu Sudan Singh S/O Late Amir Singh Resident Of Village Baligaon, P.SBaligaon, District- Vaishali, At Present Posted As Area Assistant, Under Block Agriculture Office, Banka.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Agriculture, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector, Banka.

4. The District Agriculture Officer, Banka.

5. The Block Agriculture Officer, Banka.

6. The Sub- Divisional Agriculture Officer, Banka. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. MUKESH KUMAR For the Respondent/s : Mr. KAUSHAL KISHORE,AC TO GP23 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-02-2015 Since there is no evidence to show that the petitioner was given an opportunity before Annexures-8 and 9 dated 10-7-2013 and 22-7-2013 respectively came to be passed, the writ application is disposed of after quashing

Patna High Court CWJC No.822 of 2014 dt.05-02-2015 2 / 2 Annexures 8 and 9 with a direction upon respondent no.5, Block Agriculture Officer, Banka, that he will issue specific show cause to the petitioner with regard to the issue which led to passing of Annexures 8 and 9, and after accepting the explanation of the petitioner, a fresh order will be required to be passed. Since the salary of the petitioner has been stopped because of passing of Annexures 8 and 9, the respondent-authorities are directed to take a decision with regard to the above within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order.

The respondents are also directed to release the salary of the petitioner for the intererregnum till a fresh order or decision is taken in this regard. The writ application stands disposed of in terms of the above direction. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) B.Roy/- U