Chandramali Prasad @ Chandramali Pradad Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48442 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5199 Year-2021 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Chandramali Prasad @ Chandramali Pradad Gupta Son Of Late Prakash Gupta Resident Of Village- Bichali Gali, Po And Ps- Sohsarai, TownBiharsharif, Distt- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shivji Prasad Son Of Late Badri Prasad Gupta Resident Of VillagePaharpur, Po- Anisabad, Ps- Gardanibagh, Distt- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 5199(C) of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case by Opposite Party No. 2 on the ground that the marriage of the daughter of the Opposite Party No. 2 was fixed with the son of the petitioner but then the marriage did not materlize as the side of the petitioner were demanding money. It is next submitted that no doubt the marriage of the daughter of the Opposite Party No. 2 was fixed with the son of the petitioner but then the son of the petitioner was not inclined to marry

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48442 of 2023(4) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 the daughter of the Opposite Party No. 2. As such, petitioner had no option but to rescind the marriage. It is further submitted that since the marriage could not take place, as such, the present case came to be instituted with exaggerated allegation.

4. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate - Ist Class, Patna, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 5199(C) of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) aditi/- U T