Prabhat Kumar v. Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12703 of 2013 ====================================================== Prabhat Kumar S/O Suryadeo Singh Sole Priprietor, M/S Ricon, Sudha Sadan, West Of Gandhi Murti, Dujra, Buddha Colony, Patna, Bihar, Pin- 800001 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Union Of India and Ors 2.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Md Through Its Managing Director, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai - 400051 3.

The Managing Director, Indian Oil Corporation Limited G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai - 400051 4.

The Executive Director, Lpg G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai - 400051 5.

The Director Marketing, Indian Oil Corporation Limited Corporation Office, 3079/3, J.B.Tilak Marg, New Delhi 6.

The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited Bihar State Office, 5th Floor, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, Dakbunglow Chowk, Patna 7.

The Deputy General Manager, Bihar State Office, 5th Floor, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, Dakbunglow Chowk, Patna 8.

The Chief Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indane Area Office, 1st Floor, Shahi Bhawan, Exhibition Road, Patna Bihar, Pin Code800001 9.

Shri Jitendra Kumar Sinha (PAT/120/15) S/o Shri Deonand Prasad Boring Canal Road, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the I.O.C.L.

:

Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2023

1. No one appears for the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel states that the L.P.G. distributorship has already been allotted to respondent No. 9, and the same has already been commissioned in 2016. This Court would not enter into comparative merit between the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12703 of 2013(10) dt.28-03-2023 2/2 petitioner and the respondents. The same has already been examined by the concerned authorities and respondent No. 9 has already been allotted the same.

3. I have considered the submissions. Having noticed the aforesaid arguments and by efflux of time, this writ petition has been rendered otiose and is dismissed accordingly. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Sachin/- Item No. 71.1 U