← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1556/2022disposed

Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-27Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1556 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6308 of 2020 ====================================================== Suraj Kumar Son of Sri Mahendra Prasad Resident of Village-Bijavar, Police Station Dhanarua, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Aamir Subhani, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. Dr. B. Rajendra Bihar Prashasnik Sudhar Mission Society, Genral administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. Dr. B. Rajendra Mission Director, Bihar Prashasnik Sudhar Mission Society, Genral administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Dr. Pratima, Additional Mission Director, Bihar Prashasnik Sudhar Mission Society, Genral administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

Mr. Richie Panday, D.M. Jehanabad, Bihar.

6.

Mr. Arvind Mandal Additional District Magistrate Bihar. 7.

Mr. Manoj Kumar SDO Jehanabad, Bihar.

8.

Mrs. Suranjita Sinha Nodal Officer RTPS, Jehanabad. 9.

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Officer in Charge, District Confidential Branch. 10.

Mr. Ravi Shankar Ray, C.O. Jehanabad.

11.

Mr. Ved Prakash BDO, Jehanabad Block, Jehanabad, Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar (GP 4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-06-2025 Order dated 22.04.2022 passed in CWJC No. 6308 of 2020 is complied on 08.08.2023.

2. Direction was only to pass a detailed and speaking order. Perusal of the order dated 08.08.2023, it is evident that a detailed speaking order has been passed and the same has been

Patna High Court MJC No.1556 of 2022 dt.27-06-2025 2/2 placed on record along with the show cause.

3. In the light of these facts and circumstances, the present contempt proceeding stands dropped, reserving liberty to assail the action of the respondents before appropriate forum, if the petitioner is still aggrieved.

4. With the above observation, the contempt petition stands dropped.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ranjan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.06.2025 Transmission Date NA