Sanoj Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51551 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -372 Year- 2016 Thana -HARSIDHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Sanoj Ram, S/o Nagina Ram, resident of Village- Jagdishpur Bankati Tola Bhaja Chhapra, P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sarita Devi W/o Sanoj Ram, D/o Sukhdeo Ram, resident of VillageBhan Chuck, P.S. Majhauliya, District- West Champaran. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Smt Sangeeta Sharma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 323, 324, 504, 506 of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D. P. Act.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. There is no allegation of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51551 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Sadar, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 372/2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T