Rinku Kumari @ Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46326 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Rinku Kumari @ Rinku Devi W/o- Mukesh Kumar Village - Andharwari,P.S. - Rajauli, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2025 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 210 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 29.04.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner along with other accused persons have assaulted to the informant which resulted into severe injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46326 of 2025(2) dt.31-07-2025 2/3 informant is brother-in-law of the petitioner and due to petty dispute the present occurrence took place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that she has assaulted the informant by means of iron rod and bricks but the injury report of the injured person suggest that the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent and injury of the injured person is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 210 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46326 of 2025(2) dt.31-07-2025 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T