Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16566/2015disposed

Sappu Rabidas v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-05-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16566 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2014 Thana -MAHILA PS DistrictJAMUI ====================================================== Sappu Rabidas Son of Girija Rabidas, Resident of Village - Devachak, P.S. Barhat, District - Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sindhu Devi, W/o Sappu Rabidas, D/o Sitaram Rabidas, Resident of Village - Kodwari, P.S. Khaira, District - Jamui. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jamui Mahila P.S. Case no. 2 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the husband and he is ready to keep his wife.

It is submitted that he did not appear before the learned Sessions Judge, as learned lawyer did not inform him. Considering the aforesaid facts that the petitioner is willing to keep his wife, he is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16566 of 2015 (2) dt.04-05-2015 2/2 copy of this order and the court below shall enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail, after issuing notice to the informant, on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jamui Mahila P.S. Case no. 2 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and the court below shall make efforts for reconciliation between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed and if the dispute does not resolve the court below shall pass order in accordance with law on the provisional bail of the petitioner.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Rakhi/- U T