← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2594/2019disposed

Lakshmi Narayan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-29Mr. Justice Nani Tagia2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2594 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13923 of 2016 ====================================================== Lakshmi Narayan Prasad Son of Late Shankar Prasad Resident of Village / Mohalla - Bashuhari, Post office Balua, Police Station Guthani and District Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Sri Sudhir Kumar, Principal-cum-Agriculture Production Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar. 3.

Sri Adesh Titarmare, Director of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Janardan Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocate Mr. Dipak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raghwanand (Ga11) Mr. Prabhat Kumar, AC to GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2025 This contempt application has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 04.04.2019 passed in CWJC No. 13923 of 2016 wherein, while allowing the writ petition this Court had directed the Appellate Authority to pass a final order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by a reasoned and speaking order.

2. Opposite party Nos. 2 & 3 has filed a show-cause wherein, an order has been passed by the Director Agriculture/the Appellate Authority dated 25.11.2019 (enclosed as Annexure-A to the show-cause), whereby a reasoned order

Patna High Court MJC No.2594 of 2019(5) dt.29-04-2025 2/2 has been passed, granting the relief claimed by the petitioner.

3. In view of the above, I find that the order dated 04.04.2019 passed in CWJC No. 13923 of 2016 has been complied with by the respondents.

4. Accordingly, this contempt application stands closed and disposed off.

(Nani Tagia, J) Nishant/- U