Rustam @ Rustum And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4592 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2015 Thana -AMAUR District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Rustam @ Rustum son of Late Kamir.

2. Md. Saimu son of Late Kamir.

3. Md. Farid son of Late Kamir.

4. Md. Kalu son of Late Kamir.

5. Md. Maimuddin son of Late Ershad .

6. Md. Anjar @ Anjar son of Md. Hasib.

All resident of Village- Lalchura P.S.- Amour, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.K. Jha (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 03-02-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners have renewed their prayer for anticipatory bail in Amour P.S. Case No. 16 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea.

Earlier prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 18587 of 2015 on 15.06.2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4592 of 2016 (2) dt.03-02-2016 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accusation is omnibus and general and there is a counter version of the occurrence also.

This Court is not inclined to interfere since the earlier order was passed considering the merit of the case. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T