Rajkali Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48040 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2022 Thana- DEO District- Aurangabad ====================================================== RAJKALI DEVI W/O LATE PUSHKAR BHUIYAN Resident of VillageBanda, P.S.- Deo, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mukul Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, It is a case of commission of murder. Deceased had performed two marriages and in the present case his first wife is informant and second wife is petitioner.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. No one is the eye witness of the alleged occurrence. As per postmortem report, no cause of death has been detected by the doctor so viscera was preserved and sent for FSL. No metallic, alkaloidal,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48040 of 2022(6) dt.11-05-2023 2/2 Glycosidal, pesticidal and volatile poison could be detected is viscera report. Save and except, self confessional statement of the petitioner, nothing has come against her during investigation to show her involvement in the present case. Other accused person has already been enlarged on bail by another coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.4.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1388 of 2023. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.4.2022.
The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Aurangabad in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 86 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U