Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58804/2017bail granted

Manjula Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-12Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58804 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Manjula Devi, W/o Ramchandra Mandal,

2. Ramchandra Mandal, S/o Medni Mandal, both resident of VillageTemhabanni, P.S.- Maheshkhut, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Maheshkhut P.S. Case No.65 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 328/34 Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased. Husband is already is custody.

There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners in the written report.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58804 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 six weeks from today in connection with Maheshkhut P.S. Case No.65 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T