Gulab Chandra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6557 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -189 Year- 2015 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Gulab Chandra Yadav Son of Late Siya Ram Yadav, Resident of Village - Govindpur, Police Station - Mahesh Khunt, District - Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kr.Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 189 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner and other co-accused were apprehended when they were making plan to commit crime and from possession of the petitioner fire arm was recovered. Submission is that against the petitioner for the same occurrence two cases have been instituted and besides that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and in the Arms Act case, the petitioner has been allowed bail and in this case he is suffering in custody since 30.10.2015 and, as such, he deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. does not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6557 of 2016 (2) dt.25-02-2016 2/2 dispute.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 189 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T