← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2974/2017allowed

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-27Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2974 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA THANA District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Rajesh Kumar, S/o Late Sankar Sah, Resident of Village- Pipra, Behind G D. College, P.S.- Begusarai Mahila, District- Begusarai. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sri Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-11-2017 The appellant has challenged the order dated 11.09.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge I-cumSpecial Court, POCSO Act, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 22/2016, whereby the prayer for being released on bail, in anticipation of his arrest, has been rejected. The petitioner is said to be running a school in the name and style of "Om Children Academy Residential School". The 12 year old daughter and 7 year old son of the informant were studying in that school. It has been alleged that when the informant met her daughter in the school, she confided in her that the petitioner, on some pretext or the other, misbehaved with her. When the informant confronted him, the petitioner and his wife Mamta Devi abused and assaulted the informant and also threatened her of dire consequences.

Though the daughter of the informant in her statement

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2974 of 2017 (5) dt.27-11-2017 2/2 made under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has supported the prosecution version, but the other students of the school have stated that because the daughter of the informant always used to talk to some persons on telephone in class, for which she was chastised, that the present case has been lodged. That apart, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the police, after investigation, found the allegation to be false and submitted final form; but differing with the police report, cognizance has been taken.

The offences under Sections 354B, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code do not appear to have been made out from the facts of the case. The provisions of SC/ST Act also appear to have been added to add colour and seriousness to the case. For the facts stated above, the order, dated 11.09.2017 is set aside.

The appellant is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest/surrender, on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge I-cum-Special Court, POCSO Act, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai (Mahila), P.S. Case No. 22/2016.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J.) Rakhi U T