Shashi Shekhar Thakur @ Suman v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58367 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3240 Year- 2015 Thana -MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Shashi Shekhar Thakur @ Suman S/o Late Babu Thakur Resident of Mohalla - Amgola Paraw Pokhar, P.S. - Kazi Mohammadpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shilip Devi W/o Shashi Shekhar Thakur @ Suman R/o Mohalla - Aamgola Paraw Pokhar, Lane No. 5, P.S. - Kazi Mohammadpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh Mr. Raju Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Man Mohan Kumar Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No.2.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58367 of 2017 (2) dt.08-12-2017 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and counsel for the O.P. No.2, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No.C-3240/2015 (TR. No.2503/2017) on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., East Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T