Piyush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57732 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2017 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Piyush Kumar S/o Sanjeev Singh, R/o Village- Maur, P.S.- Barbigha, DistrictSheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273, 414, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471, 188 of the I.P.C. and Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation is that 1.5 liters wine is recovered. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of disclosure of co-accused Deena Mahto made before police as per F.I.R. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 1.5 liters wine is recovered from co-accused Deena
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57732 of 2017(2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 Mahto. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura in connection with Excise case No.18 of 2017 arising out of Barbigha P.s. case No.258 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T