Kumar Prabhas v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3999 of 2013 ========================================== Arvind Kumar, son of Late Sahdeo Mahto, resident of Sahdeo Siya Sadan, 45B, Sahdeo Mahto Marg, S.K. Puri, P.S.-S.K. Puri, DistrictPatna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Patna Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, Mauryalok, Patna.

2. The Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Mauryalok, Patna.

3. The Vigilance Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Mauryalok, Patna.

4. Rajan Chandra, son of Suresh Chandra, resident of 44B, Sahdeo Marg, P.S.-S.K. Puri, District-Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ========================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9076 of 2013 ========================================== Kumar Prabhas, son of Narendra Pratap Narayan Singh, resident of Raghunath Path, R.P.S More, Police Station, Rupaspur, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation at Maurya Lok, Patna.

3. Ritesh Kumar Singh, Managing Director, Sai Residency Pvt. Ltd., (Builder Kusum Bilas Apartment), R.T. Bhawan, Punaichak, Patna- ... ... Respondent/s ========================================== Appearance :

(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3999 of 2013) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Adv (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9076 of 2013) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S.D. Sanjay ========================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Patna High Court CWJC No.3999 of 2013 dt.25-10-2018 2/2 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 25-10-2018

1. It is not in dispute that the main petition has already been disposed of. However, having found that there are certain things which in the larger public interest is required to be considered, learned Single Judge referred the matter to the Division Bench.

2. We appreciate the anxiety and the concern of the learned Single Judge which can be dealt with in an appropriate case.

3. Under the circumstances, we refrain from passing any further order on the issue. The main petition has already stood disposed of, therefore no further order. (Mukesh R. Shah, CJ) ( Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 26/10/2018 Transmission Date