Adarsh Kumar @ Adarsh Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48950 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2023 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== ADARSH KUMAR @ ADARSH KUMAR JHA SON OF SUSHIL KUMAR JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BISHUNPUR BAGHANAGRI, PSSAKRA, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nachiketa Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 356 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, the informant was going home, in the meantime, four persons came on two motorcycles snatched his mobile, Aadhar Card and other articles.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner was not apprehended on spot. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Sudhanshu Kumar, which
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48950 of 2023(2) dt.10-08-2023 2/2 has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. He submitted that the as alleged recovered motorcycle, Bearing No. BR31AQ8256 and mobile phone belongs to the petitioner with their valid documents and are annexed with annexure-2 series. No incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 06.06.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 262 of 2023.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T