Nanhak Yadav @ Mantush @ Mantus Kumar @ Mantu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48276 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2021 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== NANHAK YADAV @ MANTUSH @ MANTUS KUMAR @ MANTU KUMAR Son of Bachu Yadav R/O Vill.- Bhawani Bigha, P.S.- Chiksaura, Distt.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lallu Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State through video-conferencing. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the informant and his family members were sleeping in their room when 15-20 unknown armed miscreants forcibly entered the room, took the key of almirah, looted ornaments worth Rs. 8,00,000/-, Rs. 1,0000/- cash, other expensive household items and three mobile phones and fled away after firing.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48276 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the coaccused. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 01.06.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of detention, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Patna in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 152 of 2021.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) niku/- U T