← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53529/2017allowed

Ravi Kumar Kinker @ Ravi Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53529 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -262 Year- 2017 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Kinker @ Ravi Ranjan, son of Ram Gulam Manjhi, MohallaFida, Hussain Road, Jehanabad, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S. case no. 262 of 2017 for the offence under Sections 366(A), 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant has suspected the involvement of this petitioner in kidnapping of her daughter. The victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated that she was scolded by her mother and, as such, she left her house in tension and reached the house of her friend Shruti and when she learnt about the news of her kidnapping, she voluntarily returned back to her residence.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner deserves for grant of anticipatory bail in the instant case.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53529 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

In the F.I.R. the petitioner was only suspected and no one has seen the petitioner taking away the girl and the statement of the victim girl under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. does not indicate that the petitioner was in any manner involved in the commission of any crime.

In view of the above and considering the fact that as per the statement made on affidavit in paragraph 3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner, named above, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within one month from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the amount each to the satisfaction of SubJudge-I, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. case no. 262 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U T