Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6102/2016rejected

Bikrama Yadav @ Rameshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-10Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6102 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -357 Year- 2014 Thana -JAGDIHSPUR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Bikrama Yadav @ Rameshwar Singh Son of Manki Yadav resident of village - Purvi Mohalla, Jagdishpur, Ward No. - 18, P.S. - Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.M.P.Sinha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Session Trial No. 161 of 2015 arising out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 357 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 326 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 7.10.2015 in Criminal Misc. No. 24578 of 2015 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 20.02.2014 and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. There is a case and counter case and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6102 of 2016 (2) dt.10-02-2016 2/2 Learned A.P.P. submits that earlier after considering the statement of injured vide para 93 of the case diary the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at this stage finding no good ground for reconsideration for prayer of bail again the prayer of bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, considering the period of detention of the petitioner trial court is again directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same preferably within three months failing which the petitioner may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T