← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52511/2024bail granted

Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Sharma @ Mahesh Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-07Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52511 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Sharma @ Mahesh Singh yadav Son of Late Balram Yadav @ Baliram Yadav Resident of Swarajpuri Road, Near Mahavir School, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kanchan Sharma Wife Of Praduman Sharma Resident Of MohallaNauranga, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 251 of 2024 dated 06.05.2024, registered under Sections 376, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and u/s 4 of the POCSO Act.

3.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is the Manager/owner of a hotel in which the informant husband and a minor girl were found in a room. It has been alleged that without proper documentation, the informant's husband was given a room to stay in the hotel. It appears that the petitioner is the Manager of the hotel where prostitution was going on.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52511 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/2 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 05.05.2024.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also period of custody, this bail application is allowed. 7.

Let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (POCSO Act), Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 251 of 2024. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T