Taslima Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54813 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2017 Thana -KURLIKOT District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Taslima Khatoon, Wife of Suleman, Resident of Village- Khaiki Basti, Birnabari, P.S.- Kurlikot, District- Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kurlikot P.S. Case No.23 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons of assaulting the wife of informant with fists and slaps after tying upon her neck. She was taken to P.H.C. Thakurganj from where she was referred to Sadar Hospital where she was declared dead. There is no allegation of specific overt act against the petitioner. She is a lady.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54813 of 2017 (4) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, namely above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Kurlikot P.S. Case No.23 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, subject to the conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) N.H./- U T