← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57346/2017bail granted

Md. Shakil Ansari @ Md. Sakil Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-12-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57346 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1556 Year-2016 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md. Shakil Ansari @ Md. Sakil Ansari, son of Late Abdullah Miya, resident of Village- Jaltoli Hussaini, P.S.- Dumariyaghat, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shaida Khatoon wife of Md. Shakil Ansari @ Sakil Ansari, resident of Village- Hasanpur, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Ad.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57346 of 2017(2) dt.08-12-2017 2/2 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Trial No.395 of 2016 arising out of Complaint case No. C1556 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T