Sumant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48414 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== Sumant Kumar Aged about 26 Years Son of Sri Pramod singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar Village- Shivnar P.s- Mokama District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Thakur, Adv Mr.Vaishnavi Singh, Adv Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Braj Kishore Pd. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Mokama P.S Case No. 106 of 2025 dated 14.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with the other accused person has assaulted the informant's son.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that the main reason of scuffling is that the son of the informant went along with the petitioner to bring back his money and when he did not contacted his father for a long time, the father of the victim made a call but he found that his son was not in a position to speak. Later on, he found his son near the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48414 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 Shivnar Halt in an injured position, who disclosed that the petitioner along with others have assaulted him by means of butt of pistol and lathi and iron rod, due to which he sustained severe injuries. He further submits that it was accused persons only who has allegedly brought him for treatment. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 12.06.2025 having seven criminal antecedent.
5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. On perusal of the FIR, injury report and impugned order dated 25.06.2025, it appears that except facture of left clavicle all injuries are lacerated wound and there is no repeated blow on the vital part of the body of the injured, So, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Barh in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025 subject to the condition that the petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the Trial Court till the conclusion
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48414 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 of the Trial and one of the bailor must be the close relative of the petitioner.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Sunnykr/- U