← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47906/2022allowed

Raju Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-20Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47906 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2019 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna ====================================================== RAJU RAY Son of Late Nagina Ray Resident of Village - Ganjpar , P.S.- Athmalgola, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-03-2023 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner, who is husband of informant, is said to have tortured upon the informant in association of his family members over the dowry demand. They ousted her from her matrimonial home.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47906 of 2022(7) dt.20-03-2023 2/2 implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full dignity and honour. He never demanded any car as dowry from the informant. It is further submitted that the informant is not ready to live with the petitioner. She got remarried with other person in the year 2022 and she has been living with him happily. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the wife of the petitioner got remarried with other person, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 146 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T