← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15586/2013dismiss for nonprosecution

Deep Narayan Saha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-06-30Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15586 of 2013 ====================================================== Deep Narayan Saha S/O Late Panchu Saha Resident Of Villae Post- Khagri, District- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, Urban Development Department, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

2.

Director Of Local Bodies, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 3.

District Magistrate, Munger, Fort Area, Collectorate, Munger. 4.

Additional District Magistrate, Munger, Forte Area, Munger. 5.

Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Munger.

6.

Municipal Executive Officer, Jamalpur Municipality Jamalpur. 7.

Special Officer The Then, Jamalpur Municipality Jamalpur. 8.

Chief Councilor, Municipality, Jamalpur.

9.

Municipal Secretary, Municipality, Jamalpur.

10.

Municipal Law Officer, Municipality, Jamalpur. 11.

Municipal Finance Officer, Municipality, Jamalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, AC to GA5 Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 30-06-2025 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, Learned counsel for State and Learned Counsel for the Zila Parishad are present.

2. Vide orders dated 26.10.2024 and 16.06.2025, it transpires to this Court that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned for one week with specific direction that if none

Patna High Court CWJC No.15586 of 2013(5) dt.30-06-2025 2/2 appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date fixed, appropriate order shall be passed. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

3. In this background, it transpires to this Court that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ application and therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this writ application.

4. In this view of the matter, the present writ application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U