Pandit Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1969 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -721 Year- 2013 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Pandit Yadav son of late Baijnath Yadav Resident of Village - Damrapur , P.S. - Manpur, District - West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Pappu Kumar Barnwal son of Raj Kumar Barnwal Resident of Mohalla - New Marwari Muhalla Narkatiaganj, P.S. - Shikarpur District - West Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Sushmita Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the accompanying documents, let the petitioner above named, who has fair antecedents, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Complaint case No.721C of 2013 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1969 of 2015 (2) dt.19-01-2015 2/2 down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T