Uday Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48267 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2025 Thana- IMAMGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Uday Kumar Son of Theghu Yadav @ Tegu Yadav Resident of Village- Sohail PS- Sohail, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N A Shamsi, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2025 Heard Mr. N.A. Shamsi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 104 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-AA), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act along with Section 3⁄4 of the Indian Explosive Act and Sections 13, 16(1) (b), 17, 18, 19, 20, 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, a mobile phone of Realme company was recovered. It is also alleged that other co-accused persons have given their statement to the effect that this petitioner was also involved with them in unlawful activities.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48267 of 2025(2) dt.08-08-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that nothing except the mobile was recovered from this petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 04.04.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sherghati (Gaya), in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 104 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T