Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50413/2024bail rejected

Hareram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-17Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50413 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-622 Year-2022 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Hareram Yadav Son of Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar Yadav R/o VillageChotaka Itahama, P.S.- Barahara, District- Bhojpur at Ara ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Amresh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-01-2025 Heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No. 622 of 2022 for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 Arms Act lodged on 22.08.2022 by the informant, Shri Ram Rai.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that he got an information that all the accused persons including the petitioner with common intention of killing his son, opened fire who subsequently succumbed to the injuries in a private hospital at Ara. His other son is an eye witness to the offence having seen it from near by place where he was hidden.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50413 of 2024(4) dt.17-01-2025 2/2 This led to the FIR.

4. Though learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner tried to prove innocence of the accused showing that only to support the prosecution theory, the presence of the son has been shown in the FIR, learned APP has taken this Court to the status report which submit that the trial is on and only one witness is left to be examined. Further, the eye-witness has supported the prosecution story.

5. Considering the submissions put forward by the parties as also that the trial is at an advanced stage, it would be appropriate that the petitioner co-operates in trial, the bail application stands rejected.

6. It is expected that the learned Trial Court shall take the trial to the conclusion at an earliest.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T