Kamod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50304 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -411 Year- 2017 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Kamod Kumar, son of Jai Kishun Rai @ Jai Kishun Prasad Yadav, resident of village Shankar Saraiya Parsauna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sahin Begam, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 411 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 413, 414 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has clean antecedent. There is no recovery from his possession. His name has been disclosed by co-accused Manoj Kumar who was arrested by the police with Motorcycle which is said to have stolen one.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 411 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50304 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions
(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T