← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17233/2021disposed

Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-17Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17233 of 2021 ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh Son of Late Rameshwar Narayan Singh, Resident of Village Morsand, P.S. Runni Saidpur, Dist. Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Agriculture department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Joint Agriculture Director, Saran Division, Chapra. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 Ms. Sunita Kumari, AC to AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 17-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for grant of an appropriate writ for a direction to the respondents and to give to the petitioner the 2nd assured career progression under Bihar Employees Condition of Service (Assured Career Progression Scheme) Rules, 2003 (A.C.P.

Scheme for short) in accordance with law with all consequential benefits together with interest on the sum admissible to the petitioner, which have been illegally withheld by the respondents."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the Respondents has referred to the counter affidavit, filed in the present case, more

Patna High Court CWJC No.17233 of 2021(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/2 particularly paragraph no. 10 thereof to submit that the petitioner has already been granted 2nd ACP with effect from 22.4.2010 in the pay-scale of Rs. Rs. 10,000-15,200/-, vide memo dated 2.5.2022, hence, the grievances of the petitioner has already stood redressed.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if that be so, the present writ petition be disposed off, however, directions be issued for payment of the actual monetary benefits, in case the same have not been paid to the petitioner. It is directed accordingly.

4.

The present writ petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U