Munna Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49507 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2025 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Munna Sah S/o Late Dashrath Sah @ Dasrath Gupta Resident of VillageSonaul Subba, P.S.- Suppi, Dist- Sitamarhi 2.

Hari Narayan Mahto @ Krishnandan Mahto@ Krishna Nandan Mahto S/o Prakash Mahto Resident of Village- Sonaul Subba, P.S.- Suppi, DistSitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 324(3) and 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and Sections 3 and 4 of Damage of Public Property Act. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 has antecedent of three cases and petitioner No. 2 is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that no doubt petitioner No. 1 has antecedent of three cases, but all cases were instituted in between 2015 and 2016 and thereafter no case came to be instituted. It is further submitted that in sum and substance the allegation is that a child got hit by a tractor and thus was killed, as such the residents of the locality blocked

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49507 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2 the road and created ruckus.

4.

It is submitted that there is no allegation in the FIR that any public property was damaged. It is next submitted that since the petitioners are residents of the nearby place where the occurrence took place as such they had also gone to the place of occurrence and came to be implicated.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T