Ram Babu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58216 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2021 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== RAM BABU YADAV Son of Ram Pukar Yadav Resident of Village - Asthua, P.S.- Sighwara, Dist.- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sameer Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-04-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 146 of 2021, for the offence punishable under Section 414, 467 and 468/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with his other associates were involved in the theft of motorcycles bearing registration Nos. BR-06B-8769 and BR32K-3103, which were recovered from the vacant land near the house of the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58216 of 2021(2) dt.26-04-2022 2/3 implicated in this case mere on suspicion. He further submits that petitioner is not involved in the alleged theft of motorcycle, rather, he disclosed the name accused to be Raja Yadav @ Raj Shakhar Yadav, who had fled away taking the key of the motorcycles. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged motorcycle. The petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 28.07.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation and period of custody undergone by the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 146 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58216 of 2021(2) dt.26-04-2022 3/3

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T