Ramavati Kunwar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53421 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHEBGANJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Ramavati Kunwar W/o late Jai Kishun Dubey Resident of VillageRampur Situahi, P.S. Sahebganj, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 192 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Sections-302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a widow lady aged about 60 years. There is no allegation of any specific overt act against her. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence.

In the written report, it is alleged that husband of the deceased along with this petitioner who is said to be the concubine of the husband of the deceased has killed the daughter of the informant by hanging her.

In this manner, there is only general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53421 of 2017 (3) dt.12-01-2018 2/2 In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 192 of 2015 to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will liable to cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V.