Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4200 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Madhubani ====================================================== Chandan Yadav aged about 19 years Son Of Arun Yadav Resident Of Village Sinuwara P.S Arer, District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Kumari Shubham, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30a and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
As per the prosecution case, 39 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way concerned with the alleged recovery. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition. Petitioner is in custody since 22.10.2020. Charge sheet has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4200 of 2021(2) dt.19-03-2021 2/2 already been submitted.
Considering the quantity of recovery and period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge II cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in GO No.196 of 2020 on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T