Azad Paswan @ Bihari Paswan @ Aazadjee v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7587 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2012 Thana -DAWATH District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Azad Paswan @ Bihari Paswan @ Aazadjee Son of Shri Madan Paswan, Resident of Village - Parsaganda, P.S. - Sikraul, District - Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.K.Choursiya(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 17-02-2016 Petitioner is facing accusation(s) punishable under Section 121(A), 386, 387 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. His prayer for bail was earlier considered and rejected by order dated 06.07.2015. He was, however, granted liberty to renew prayer for bail after six months. On such renewal upon expiry of the period, the learned Sessions Judge rejected prayer for bail on 13.1.2016 wherefrom it appears that the case is still pending for appearance of the other co-accuseds. The petitioner is in custody since 10.09.2014. It further appears that some of the accused of the case have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail.
Considering the above and also the incarceration of the petitioner, the petitioner abovenamed is directed to be released on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7587 of 2016 (2) dt.17-02-2016 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-V, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trial No. 483 of 2015 (arising out of Dawath P.S. Case No. 81 of 2012)subject to the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailers shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner shall appear in person on the dates fixed in the case. In case he defaults in doing so on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T