Lutan Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8956 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -352 Year- 2015 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ====================================================== Lutan Manjhi Son of Late Sarayug Manjhi Resident of village - Dilawarchak, Police Station - Dhanarua, District - Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Sahni(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under section 25(1-B)A and Section 26 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, from the room of the petitioner, one country made rifle without bolt and one country made pistol besides two cartridges were recovered on 14.9.2015 and the petitioner was apprehended.

Submission is of false implication and that nothing was recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. The house is joint house, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and by remaining in custody he has sufficiently been penalized

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8956 of 2016 (2) dt.25-04-2016 2/2 to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the detention of the petitioner, now he is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Hare Ram, Judicial Magistraste, 1st Class, Masaurhi, Patna in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No.352 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) N.H./- U T