Gauri Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52232 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2016 Thana -PARASBIGHA District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Gauri Devi, W/o Ajay Yadav, R/o Village- Dihuri, P.S.- Paras Bigha, District- Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Paras Bigha P.S. Case No. 129 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B, 201, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased. From the written report itself, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is living separately from the deceased and she has no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her husband.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52232 of 2017 (3) dt.14-11-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Paras Bigha P.S. Case No. 129 of 2016 to the satisfaction of Sro Pranav Kumar Bharti, learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Jehanabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T