Subhash Vashist v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4586 of 2018 ====================================================== Subhash Vashist, Son of Jeet Ram Vashist, Resident of 290B/ Adarsh Nagar near Babu Cinema, P.S.-Adarsh Nagar, District-Sonipat, Haryana. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Prohibition Excise and Registration Department, Bihar at Patna.
2. The District Magistrate-Cum-Confiscating Officer, Kaimur at Bhabhau.
3. The Officer-in-Charge-Durgawati, P.S. Durgawati, District -Kaimur at Bhabhau.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Vivek Prasad- GP 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 03-04-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Truck) bearing Registration No.HR69B-0768, which has been seized in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No.160 of 2017 due to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.
Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case,
Patna High Court CWJC No.4586 of 2018(2) dt.03-04-2018 2/2 the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing the bank guarantee to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua within a period of one week from the date of his furnishing the bank guarantee and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Sunil/- U