← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/356/2018disposed

Ajay Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Excise Prohibition And Registration Department,

2018-03-28Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.356 of 2018 ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Mishra, S/o Jagdish Mishra, R/o C/o Abhay Kumar, Pua Gali, Chowk, P.S.- Chowk, Patna City, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Excise Prohibition & Registration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

3. The Superintendent of Excise, Sitamarhi.

4. The Officer In Charge of Runni Saidpur P.S., District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha (GA1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner has prayed for release of the vehicle Nano Car bearing Reg. No. BR-01AR-3935, which has been seized by the police in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.28 of 2017, District-Sitamarhi for the offence under Sections 30, 30(g), 38(1)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is alleged that 21.6 liters of foreign liquor have been recovered from the vehicle in question.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court for provisional release of the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.356 of 2018 (2) dt.28-03-2018 vehicle in question.

Considering the facts and circumstances, pending finalization of confiscation proceeding, let the vehicle of the petitioner be released provisionally within one week from the date of production of proof of ownership and registration of the vehicle in favour of the petitioner subject to the following conditions:- (i) Petitioner shall furnish a surety in form of a bank guarantee or by deposit of original title deeds of immovable property lying within the jurisdiction of the authority concerned or any other security of like nature valued at Rs.

2,00,000/- (two lakhs)) to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi/authority concerned.

(ii) The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will not deal with the vehicle in question and shall not alienate or encumber the same creating any kind of adverse interest against the interest of the State, he will not use the vehicle for any illegal purpose and as and when required, he will produce the vehicle in question before the competent court/authority.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.356 of 2018 (2) dt.28-03-2018 (iii) At the time of release, the concerned authority/court shall get prepared a photograph duly certified in presence of the petitioner and panchnama of the vehicle in question shall also be prepared and keep the same on record which may be used as secondary evidence.

(iv) Petitioner undertakes not to challenge the said photograph and panchnama so prepared in his presence at the time of release of vehicle in question for use in course of trial or the confiscation proceeding, as the case may be.

The application stands disposed of.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T