Chintu Mistri And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3777 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -175 Year- 2014 Thana - PANDARAK District- PATNA ===================================================

1. Chintu Mistri Son of Jugal Mistri.

2. Ravi Chauhan Son of Chandramauli Chauhan Both are resident of Village-Chintamanchak, P.S-Pandarak, Distt.- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Singh (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.

29.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B) A and 26 of the Arms Act.

Considering that no arms were recovered from the possession of the Petitioners who have fair antecedents, let them be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 175 of 2014 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3777 of 2015 (2) dt.29-01-2015 close relative of the Petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners and the other bailor shall be the father/mother/brother of the Petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the Petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T