Rajesh Kumar Raushan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1582 of 2018 ====================================================

1. Rajesh Kumar Raushan, Son ofNagendra Ram, Resident of VillageKudwa Bhatti Chowk, P.S. Kalyanpur, District-Samastipur.

2. Shashi Bhushan, Son of Nandu Ram, Resident of Village-Jankipuram Colony, P.S. Kaji Mohammadpur, District-Muzaffarpur,

3. Rajesh Kumar, Son of Adalu Mahto, Resident of Village-Belahi Lachhi, P.S. Minapur, District-Muzaffarpur,

4. Sanjay Kumar, Son of Badri Paswan, Resident of Village-Rasulpur Salim, P.S. Minapur, District-Muzaffarpur.

5. Chandra Kala Kumari, D/o Bhagnarayan Sah, Resident of VillageRaghai, P.S. Minapur, District-Muzaffarpur,

6. Kailash Prasad, Son of Dharam Sah, Resident of Village-Rohuavir Narayan, P.S. Musahri, District-Muzaffarpur,

7. Sanju Kumari, D/o Rasde Ram, Resident of Village-Bagh Musa, P.S. Hajipur District-Vaishali,

8. Braj Mohan Kumar, Sono f Ram balak Prasad, Resident of VillagePunarvara, P.S. Saidpur, District-Sitamarhi,

9. Sujit Ram, Son of Mahendra Ram, Resident of Village-Belahi Lachhi, P.S. Minapur, District-Muzaffarpur,

10. Mukesh Kumar, Son of Maghnath Ray, Resident of Village-Bharat Nagar, P.S. Gayghat, District-Muzaffarpur,

11. Keshav Kumar, Son of Ashok Kumar Pandey, Resident of VillageRusulpur Wajid, P.S. Ahiyapur, District-Muzaffarpur.

12. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Son of Uday Mahto, Resident of Village-Lalpur, P.S. Bisfi, District-Madhubani,

13. Sunil Kumar, Son of Uday Prakash Singh, Resident of Village-Rusulpur Wajid, P.S. Ahiyapur, District-Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

2. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur

3. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

4. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Muzaffarpur.

5. The Block Development Officer-cum-Member Secretary, Block Employment Committee, Block-Minapur, Muzaffarpur, .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, GP- 20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 16-02-2018 In the order no.2 dated 02.02.2018, at page no.2, instead of "L.P.A. No. 501 of 2017 vide order dated 14.11.2017",

Patna High Court CWJC No.1582 of 2018 (3) dt.16-02-2018 2/2 a reference was made to the order in "C.W.J.C. No. 14493 of 2008 vide order dated 21.3.2012" has been typed.

In view of the above, necessary modification in order no.2 dated 02.02.2018, at page no.2, is required. Accordingly, order no.2 dated 02.02.2018, at page no.2, so far as the reference of C.W.J.C. No. 14493 of 2008 vide order dated 21.3.2012 is concerned, it should be read as L.P.A. No. 501 of 2017 vide order dated 14.11.2017.

In view of the decision of the Division Bench in L.P.A. No. 501 of 2017 dated 14.11.207, Annexure-4, the writ petition is disposed of with similar terms and direction to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law after reinstating the petitioners.

It is made clear that for the intervening period no salary will be paid to the petitioners. The salary of the petitioners would depend upon the final out come of the enquiry conducted by the respondents, so far as it relates to the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U