Deepak Saw @ Mukesh Saw v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5017 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -162 Year- 2014 Thana -NAWINAGAR District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Deepak Saw @ Mukesh Saw, Son of Gopal Saw @ Gopal Pd., Resident of village - Mahabir Mandir Gadawa, P.S. Rehala, District - Gadawa, ( Jharkhand ) .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Leelawati Kumari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 05-02-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is in custody since 28.10.2014 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering the allegation that Rs. 18,000/- was withdrawn by the informant from Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Nabinagar Road Branch and thereafter, he went to Punjab National Bank and in the meantime, noticed that some one had taken Rs. 17,000/- and he found the petitioner moving and he was intercepted and a note of Rs. 1,000/- was recovered from his possession as also the fact that the petitioner has claimed that the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5017 of 2015 (2) dt.05-02-2015 money, recovered was his own and he has no criminal antecedent, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 162 of 2014 with the following conditions:
1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.
2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court.
4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.) Vats/- U T