Mamta Kumari @ Mamta Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46971 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Mamta Kumari @ Mamta Devi Wife of Late Tiwari Singh Resident of Village- Pirapur Mathura, P.S. -Goraul, District -Vaishali 2.
Sarwadev Singh @ Sarwdev Singh Son of Late Nevalal Singh Resident of Village- Chakgulamuddin, Ps- Vaishali Belsar Op, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pranav Kumar, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. II, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 16.04.2025, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, committed maar-peet with cousin brother of the informant, namely, Tiwari Singh and subsequently, killed him by administering poison.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46971 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/3 have committed no offence. Petitioner No. 1 is none else than wife of the deceased and Petitioner No. 2 is father-in-law of the deceased. As a matter of fact, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, there was a quarrel between the deceased and petitioner no. 1 and due to the same, the deceased committed suicide by consuming poison and informant, who happens to be cousin brother of the deceased, only with a view to grab the property of the deceased, falsely implicated these petitioners. During investigation, none of the witnesses have claimed to have seen these petitioners committing the alleged offence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and relationship between the parties, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Vaishali at
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46971 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 3/3 Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 201 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T