Pramod Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46543 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2025 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Pramod Sahani S/o Late Yadolal Sahani R/o Village- Pakari, Ward NO. 10, P.O.- Purvi Pakari, P.S.- Dumariyaghat, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pratik, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms, Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Majhauliya P.S Case No. 132 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with other accused persons had looted Rs. 4600/-, ATM Card and Credit Card of HDFC Bank, Vivo Y56 Mobile Phone from the informant

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner's name has been figured from the confessional statement of the co-accused and no TIP has been conducted by the authorities.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46543 of 2025(2) dt.31-07-2025 2/2 Moreover petitioner is neither the driver nor the owner of the said vehicle which was used in committing loot. He further submit that charge sheet has already been submitted. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2025 having one antecedent as mentioned in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petitioner.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the FIR, impugned order dated 02.06.2025, it appears nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Moreover, no TIP has been conducted by the Police Officials and also considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Majhauliya P.S Case No. 132 of 2025.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Sunnykr/- U T