Haribansh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17452 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2011 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Haribansh Singh Son of Sri Tribhuan Singh, R/o Dakshsinaya Housing Complex, Block A 2nd Floor, Tegharia , P. O.- Hatiara P.S. - Golabari - Kestopur, Kolkata.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. H.A.Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 17-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468/120B IPC. It is submitted that petitioner is one of the Executive Directors of the OCPL Company. The informant alleged that he and others deposited money in the insurance company but he was not given insurance policy and the accused including the petitioner have caused loss of Rs. 60,000/- to the complainant-informant. The informant has not made any specific allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 29.1.2015. He has been granted bail in similar case vide Cr. Misc. no. 23659 of 2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17452 of 2015 (3) dt.17-07-2015 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad/court concerned in Aurangabad Town P. S. Case No. 82 of 2011 arising out of Complaint Case No. 27 of 2011 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T