Raja Sahani @ Raja Kumar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58090 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2021 Thana- PHENHARA District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAJA SAHANI @ RAJA KUMAR SAHANI Son of Late Ram Lochan Sahni @ Mahendra Sahni Resident of Village - Mankarwa, P.s.- Phenhara, Distt.- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Phenhara P.S. Case No. 96 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections-188, 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution case, in short, is that 72 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 72

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58090 of 2021(2) dt.08-12-2021 2/2 liters wine is recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner is not owner of the said motorcycle. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused and local chowkidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Phenhara P.S. Case No. 96 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T